I always hate those things and think they make no sense; anyone willing to trade their time for a few pennies cant possibly buy anything you’re selling.

Probably the reason it makes no economical sense is why Brave ended up just launching a shitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree I’d never do it or make a platform that does it. But millions of casual game users do choose to view ads instead of paying $2 for the ad-free version. Implicitly they’re making the choice that their time is worth very little. Wonder if made explicit they’d choose differently, or if it’s just a matter of the default setting (ads by default, pay to remove vs no ads be paid to watch).

I wouldn’t know, maybe nostr:nprofile1qqsxu35yyt0mwjjh8pcz4zprhxegz69t4wr9t74vk6zne58wzh0waycpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtc3d03sk does since he understands the gaming world; but I would guess most would prefer to pay but don’t have the means to do it (ie no banking)

The other related thing is the insane amount of PPV traffic on garbage networks out there. There’s clearly a large market for it, and there’s enough money to keep that going. Kind of talking out of my hat here since I’m not versed in it but every time I stumble on these networks doing billions of impressions at a penny CPM it’s startling

I'd like to think that 21 sats won't always be worth a mere 2¢. One day they may have the equivalent purchasing power of $21 today...

I still wouldn’t waste my time watching ads for sats.

Everyone has a price, though, right? For enough sats I'd wager you would.

The homeless and unemployed could do it to at least make something. "Will watch ads for sats."