Calling someone a "bitcoin maximalist" and trying to claim that a "maximalist" consensus exist is the lowest form of argument in this space. Funnily enough, it often comes from people who claim they are improving the discourse.
Discussion
'Bitcoiner', easy.
It’s all so . . . it’s bullshit.
It’s a low effort, low IQ attempt at a “put down.”
Wait, I’m a maxi… wait, I don’t understand the question.
It’s fashionable to accuse anyone on the long side of the spectrum on any opinion you hold, to be an extremist / zealot.
In contemporary dialogue people think they are the epicentre of a floating spectrum, rather than themselves floating on a fixed spectrum.
I think part of this is that smartphones and web algorithms have tricked young brains into believing they are the solipsistic centre of the universe. Bless.
Bad actors gonna act bad and it starts with the creator of the term.
🥬 🌶️ 🧄 🥕 🧂
🤲
True, Bitcoin maxis have some of the most intense and interesting arguments within the “in group”.