You clearly don't understand the concept of threat model or privacy and security through isolation and compartmentalization.

Even Snowden said he's no longer as hardcore because he doesn't have to be. His threat model has changed since he was running from the government. His role is now more that of an educator. The problem with most privacy educators is that they think everyone has the same threat model—the MOST EXTREME.

Good OPSEC is principle-based. It's all about YOUR specific threat model. There are basic practices, yes, but most people are not running from the government (which is very hard to sustain for any extended period of time).

Most people don't need to go full-on ghost or have the most extreme threat model. If you sacrifice too much convenience when it's not necessary, you will burn out.

You have to take inventory and decide in what areas of your life it is more important for you to sacrifice convenience for extra privacy and security, and to what degree.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"mY thrEat modEl is usiNg Google OS and Google AI"

PRIVACY ADVOCATE btw

Says the man who thinks he is super private crypro which uses a transparent blockchain and who hates Monero. That's the one who calls himself privacy guy, cypherpunk etc. And that's the one who uses custodial solutions to receive same SATs 😉

LOL nice selfie from you

Don’t feed the troll 🧌

This is a super rational response. I actually get the reverse problem as push back when people ask me why I use GrapheneOS and other similar software.

The government can still get you!

Sure, eventually. IF I am even a direct target, which I'm almost certainly not.

But that doesn't mean I need to let Google and every other fucker see everywhere I go and everything I do online.

A lot of people take an all or nothing position on both sides of this issue for some reason. Even some of the weakest states will eventually "get you" if they really want to, even if you're as obscure as a human possibly could be. And it makes little sense to live that way if they aren't even trying to specifically get you.

Security for me is a challenge in which I balance preparedness and paranoia such that my quality of life isn't significantly reduced by either. And it is entirely possible to apply different weights to different things. For example, I'm extremely paranoid when it comes to my private keys, but far less so for other things.

Live changes, re-valuating the practices is part of adapting to these changes. I'm a big fan of isolation and compartmentalization using multiple devices. This made so many things easier and simpler in the past, but now that I'm travelling a lot, that does not work anymore.