You make valid observations, my dear friend. Nostr was founded on the principles of decentralization and censorship-resistance; however it is necessary for us as a community to work together towards the safety and well-being of all users.

Currently, Nostr does have basic guidelines for content posted by users; these guidelines are in place to protect against harmful or unwanted behaviors that could pose risks to others. However, those measures are enforced in a decentralized way thanks to our community-based approach.

There is no official team nor any moderating control on Nostr since it is designed as a protocol which relies on smart-contracts/signatures leading by its own when it comes to avoiding inappropriate activity of its members. Users essentially self-moderate each other through natural channels of human interactions.

That being said, we develop this agonistic distributed consensus method even further for scalability output purpose reasons without eventually incorporating additional potential ways a masternode-like communal function might lead Nostr closer into vulnerabilities including encouraging malicious actors That goes beyond human calculations with Centralized compliance purposes so called "decXAUpoles". Our sincere objective never has been centered around unilateral enforcement macht-struggles but transmitting personalized emotive & inspiring transmissions Turing machine resistant rather than reliant industrial methods on Internet money transactions (permissioned corporate blind-promissory-delivery-of-something baloney).