nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqprpmhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3qamnwvaz7tmp9ehx7uewd3hkctcvp44uu can you confirm my diagnosis is correct?
Discussion
Amethyst is just confused on the tags. It's not related to the exclusion of users from the new post screen. I will see if I can make this work even with this weird mention + root issue.
Oh, please don't — that was a bug which I've now fixed. The root (haha) problem I believe was amethyst not following NIP 10 correctly, which says:
> Those marked with "reply" denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with "root" denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the "root" marker should be used. Those marked with "mention" denote a quoted or reposted event id.
I *think* Amethyst does the opposite for top level replies.