I agree with you that it is a slippery slope and that politicians are the worst offenders. however, I take significant issue with the idea that all forms of “speech” should enjoy complete immunity from consequences. I’m not saying that is your argument and I don’t think the Federal Gov should be regulating much of anything. But I do believe a nuanced argument can be had around the idea of groups regulating speech of individuals on some level and in some way. Ideally without state sponsored violence.