You are thinking in analogies. I had a Bitcoiner friend who went insane and had to take a year off before resuming his work because he got too deep into the rabbit hole and started seeing connections where there were none. I'm not trying to insult you, but only relation between a fractionally reserved balance in a ledger and the quantum state of some sub atomic particle is some of the words used in the English language. They aren't related in any other meaningful way

Just forget the words for a second and try to understand what you saying, it's doesn't make any sense

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's motivated reasoning. He sees whatever he wants to see and disregards anything that doesn't fit into whatever his original hypothesis was

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq0z029tpys6jfuc8a5hwyuk8ea98sfqyl036zanqvppmdt2z0mnhqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uqzpqjx46539l9mh4kvkrvexaqfd3txkjp3k5qs46aq6dd2ttrx00dfqvkmwg

😂

Please show me anywhere else in physics where we have isomorphism between a quantifiable amount of boltzman entropy (heat/kelvin) and Shannon entropy (satoshis/utxo set) who’s relationship is both memory and time.

To say Bitcoin is not physics is literally to avoid the obvious. We are literally watching the construction of time from first principle thermodynamics.

Nothing else in physics has demonstrated discretized time through thermodynamic change with entropy on both sides of the transformation quantifiable.

Have you gotten yourself checked for Schizophrenia?

I guess the empirical evidence of Bitcoin that anyone can verify is meaningless.

It has no relationship to energy, time, entropy and information. It’s not physics, it’s just money! Silly me.

Even a chair is made out of electrons and shit. But if someone asks what it is made of, any sane person would say metal or wood etc. I'm being dead serious, you should get yourself checked or talk to your loved ones about it. The way you are thinking right now shows very clear signs of mental illness

😂 ok man.

“Bitcoin maximalist” literally rejecting the objective empirical proof of Bitcoin.

It’s more likely you’re just incapable of understanding what i am talking about, thus the reason why resorted to a metaphor for the layman in the first place; the very point you are stuck on.