I remain 100% in Bitcoin instead of owning property because I don’t trust the government not to use a direct energy weapon on my neighborhood.
Discussion
I think there are other more direct concerns in the "threat probability matrix" than direct-energy weapons, but it's never a zero percent chance, and I whole-heartedly applaud your dedication and risk-mitigation.
FWIW, I first heard about "threat probability and threat impacts" from npub15879mltlln6k8jy32k6xvagmtqx3zhsndchcey8gjyectwldk88sq5kv0n on an early episode (or rewind of it.) Way back when Jack was still recording podcasts in his car. https://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/tsprw-54
Oh nice one, actual threat probability. Will check it out mate.
Thanks mate, I always like to stay ahead of these non-zero risks by acquiring as much Bitcoin as possible.
With property taxes, do you own any property outright? Or are we just pretending being capitalists when we share the same “renting” of property from government like communist regimes?
And I’m in a country where you can’t even defend your property with weapons, so I’m basically making a massive investment in developing government owned land that I rent through property taxes and rates, that I then cannot defend, and that will possibly be taken as reparations or war taxes or eminent domain for some save the planet climate change park etc.
Not that I’m against owning a property, as a lot of what governments do is to keep the property Ponzi going, it just feels much lower priority at the moment than stacking bitcoin.