Dude. This is the one good idea they've had recently. They're trying to remain relevant.
Discussion
Need more experts to sign.
Do you mean "experts" or experts? Lol
I think it's really important that we have an honest debate among people who actually understand a fair amount of this and have an interest to understand. That is, a lot of real experts. If they're just trying to rush signatures though, well, that's similar to the way the Constitution was rushed, but unlike that noise, we can opt out on the individual level by not running that version of the software, and refusing to acknowledge a consensus change later down the line if we think it's wrong.
I'm sure it would be good to get some expert opinions on it. However the core Devs have lost all credibility.
Yup.
nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzdmhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn9qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcam28zl is my go-to for summaries on technicals and tradeoffs. The leading Core devs are dangerous as evidenced by their refusal to carry out arguments in good faith, and their philosophical illiteracy as regards incentives and human interaction.
I like to try to synthesize an understanding from lots of different perspectives though, and of course come to my own conclusions every step along the way via my own logic. Keeps my informed perspective decentralized itself haha!