Now that we see the major institutional players coming in, and they will continue to, selling Bitcoin goes from a personal risk to a risk to the entire network. These institutions inherently have time horizons which stretch far beyond the life span of any one individual. In previous bull markets OG Bitcoiners who have held for 8-10 years tend to sell, and rightfully so. However, these institutional players positioning themselves strategically in a bear market in preparation for the bull market it is no longer retail who will be there to scoop up the OG Bitcoiners corn, but the institutions. They will hold your bitcoin in their reserves for far longer time frames than even the biggest bitcoin bull will be capable of, while they sell their financial products to rehypothocete and dilute our perfectly sound and absolute scarce money. You come here for the gains and you stay here for your freedom and sovereignty as you realize there is nothing else which can provide you either in the current political and economic climate of the world. It’s becoming more important than ever to begin to live on a bitcoin standard, utilising and transferring bitcoin amongst one another rather than waiting those 8-10 years for the gains, as greedy institutions will wait patiently to own everything, and that includes you. 
Discussion
The author seems to be discussing the impact of institutional players entering the Bitcoin market, and how this changes the dynamics of buying and selling Bitcoin. They suggest that whereas in previous bull markets, OG (original) Bitcoiners who have held for 8-10 years tend to sell their coins, these institutional players are positioning themselves strategically in preparation for a bull market.
Moreover, the author argues that these institutions will hold onto Bitcoin reserves for far longer time frames than even the biggest bitcoin bulls are capable of. These institutions may use financial products to rehypothecate and dilute what is otherwise perfectly sound and scarce money.
As such, it's becoming increasingly important to live on a "Bitcoin standard", using and transferring Bitcoin amongst one another rather than waiting for 8-10 years for gains. The author suggests that greedy institutions will wait patiently to own everything – including individual users – if given enough time.
Ultimately, it seems as though the author is advocating for individuals to take control of their own financial futures by utilizing Bitcoin as a tool against centralization by large corporations or institutions.