Beyond important it’s a necessity. The tricky part who inputs the information and if so how do we reach consensus of truth and if so who is to say what is truth. It’s a very complex problem that I haven’t put much thought into until now. I think the goal would be let anybody publish anything but design a credibility score and people can read and think for themselves additionally if one topic has 90% of people reaching consensus then you highlight those dynamics additionally to credibility scores.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.