I was there for all of that.

I've been in dogecoin since before the deep state injected the "doj coin" pronunciation and the original devs went along with it

I constantly get banned from dogecoin discussion forums for being angry at the "doj coin" pronunciation, because of devs too spineless to stand with me on that topic - the problem has festered for years

Michi banned me from the dogecoin Discord not only for this, but also for calling her out for bullshitting about the hardware backdoors in modern CPUs (such as Intel management engine)

The bitcoin fork with a huge network and low transaction fees and a picture of Kabosu for a logo deserves:

* devs who would call it "doggie coin"

* devs who would be annoyed at people calling it "doj coin"

* devs who would be fucking pissed at hardware manufacturers undermining network security with hardware backdoors

Dogecoin having the devs it has is fuckin weird. We live in a weird timeline.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Let me also add:

* Devs who hate censorship and love decentralization - it's a fucking bitcoin fork, in case the current devs aren't aware??

At the time all the bitcoin forks were fair, and finite. There were some premines, but doge was the ultimate infinite money printing scheme.

Bitcoin imho has largely stated true to its principles. It's a level playing field, which is what I like about that. Very few of the 10,000 copies can claim that.

Its about as close to a decent level playing field as we can get, imho.

Not sure what you mean in the first part. Dogecoin had no premine.

Agreed on Bitcoin largely staying true to its principles and being a level playing field, but same for dogecoin, it just deserves better.

It sure did. Same dudes started tons of coins at the time.

Again not sure what you mean but dogecoin did not have a pre-mine

We can agree to differ on this one! Thanks for raising some interesting points.