By not picking up garbage through Datum?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

individual miners running datum choose which transactions are included in the blocks they mine

they can choose to mine spam

You are right. However it seems like if you are Ocean miner you most likely are not mining spam and Datum is helpful for that purpose. Ocean rather than just a pool seems to be an idea. Idea evolving around Bitcoin mining decentalization and Bitcoin as monetary network.

Maybe I’m wrong but this is how I see it, so why not to preach that?

They _can_, but there's no good reason they _would_. They also have the freedom to _not_ mine the spam, unlike with other pools that force them to do so.

And can't comprehend why Odell choose to expose himself with arguments so so flat.

ocean blocks has the best health if you are measuring it by spam

Damn. nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprfmhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5hszxthwden5te0wpex2mtfw4kjuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcqsjag4 too

What am I missing. Where are we headed?

🤔

I feel crazy.

Do you see any issue with the changes to default op_return settings in v30?

personally i think core maintainers should have left the default unchanged and if node operators wanted to increase it manually they could

i also think node operators should have more options, in general, one of the reasons i donate my time to building out opensats

all that said, i do not think changing the default will “kill bitcoin” or represents a major change to the network, these transactions are valid and being confirmed regardless, lots of fear peddling that is unproductive

That makes sense. I am not generally someone who enjoys peddling fear. And I do not think it will break bitcoin.

I do wonder what will change with this update though. Seems like there are potential consequences that people are ignoring.

And I feel like there is a lot of gas lighting which is a red flag for me.