Replying to Avatar Matt Lorentz

Very cool! I see the whole picture now. How did you get the content warning showing in Amethyst? Did that note just happen to already have a content warning on it? We are using a more robust ontology for content reports than what is defined in NIP-56. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on it and whether or not it would be useful to you. https://github.com/rabble/nips/blob/724e05e762a634e501bdcf6cbefaa91f99b1903b/69.md

Here is what we publish when you report someone in Nos:

{

"content": "This content has been reported for Spam using NIP-69 vocabulary https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/457",

"id": "03fdb75f9a8c927247cc4fc20abb419bb02932e615f056f67971e6cb8d073e09",

"tags": [

[

"L",

"MOD"

],

[

"l",

"MOD>SP",

"MOD"

],

[

"e",

"79123c0f6e54b330c8e1abba7ef5d6919ae493b072dcac7b603cada5f54bf4d3",

"spam"

]

],

"created_at": 1697565603,

"kind": 1984,

"sig": "5de629322692f102b85a8fc9921ce75b0f78fa3d4ff6f1d5cc69a777a75e6761b3448a689e1799d5d7e1f03aedad709910df03d2800e9801a8c9368841f46858",

"pubkey": "b1e4418e15a3660b5fa29e15e9e543427f2b3969617136be76072c7d674779a2"

}

Thank you. I'm glad that it can be understood. I think i really need to improve documentation in Github to make it easier. šŸ˜…

> How did you get the content warning showing in Amethyst? Did that note just happen to already have a content warning on it?

Oh no, i was intentionally made that post marked by using NIP-36 directly on Amethyst. What i have test was how my nostr-filter-relay test relay (wss://nostr-id-test-relay.hf.space) will react if i posted that negative comment. It works correctly by excluding those event. It will be merged soon into main relay (wss://nostr-id-relay.hf.space).

> https://github.com/rabble/nips/blob/724e05e762a634e501bdcf6cbefaa91f99b1903b/69.md

It is nice NIPs proposal to have list of ontology for labelling. I'm confused a bit since this PR seems to be cancelled because NIP-32 has been merged and superseded it, right? Also what is the source or reference to determine those ontology structure (IH, IL, NA, NS, etc.)?

Actually, i have already made considerations to transform current data format (kind: 9978) into NIP-32 format https://github.com/atrifat/nostr-monitoring-tool/issues/1 . Maybe i will do that after finishing other planned features (sentiment analysis and topic classification).

Currently, this is data format used by nostr-filter-relay internally. Data in "content" field (JSON stringified) were used in nostr-filter to determine the filtering. I think i need to format this in more efficient structure into NIP-32 compatible format. šŸ˜…

Example of language classification data:

{

"content": "[{\"confidence\":82,\"language\":\"ja\"}]",

"created_at": 1700614355,

"id": "event_id",

"kind": 9978,

"pubkey": "pubkey_of_classifier_bot",

"sig": "signature",

"tags": [

[

"d",

"nostr-language-classification"

],

[

"t",

"nostr-language-classification"

],

[

"e",

"75316bf6db0c75f8e57d2f3a2044d6eadacac92bfda780c62a89d5c47725fbe1"

],

[

"p",

"34a85403b43ff13441c7d79c98ba0f036add04b084b24f91c10d643f6d3f3665"

]

]

}

Example of hate speech (toxic comment) classification data:

{

"content": "{\"identity_attack\":0.6200000047683716,\"insult\":0.4620000123977661,\"obscene\":0.010999999940395355,\"severe_toxicity\":0,\"sexual_explicit\":0.0020000000949949026,\"threat\":0.004999999888241291,\"toxicity\":0.8059999942779541}",

"created_at": 1700000000,

"id": "event_id",

"kind": 9978,

"pubkey": "pubkey_of_classifier_bot",

"sig": "signature",

"tags": [

[

"d",

"nostr-hate-speech-classification"

],

[

"t",

"nostr-hate-speech-classification"

],

[

"e",

"c86cf6f0f7a30adfbd231d0e6d7b48c6d8909dd06bbcde9dd62a05f5ced072b5"

],

[

"p",

"dc369036ad76c7fe51b381ace9569e7add87c03dc74d9ab73b7e3299c18fe1c2"

]

]

}

Example of SFW/NSFW classification data:

{

"id": "event_id",

"created_at": 1696817846,

"kind": 9978,

"pubkey": "pubkey_of_classifier_bot",

"sig": "signature",

"content": "[{\"id\":\"58bd02d8c46eaa6f1598d5eff7cb33c06ff57c4c9ad3dad32ae2b70d3258f661\",\"author\":\"5fd004926969381ac2bb3a32720036d9f9632d29fb22dc1bf5d8fb1c9e265798\",\"is_activitypub_user\":false,\"has_content_warning\":false,\"has_nsfw_hashtag\":false,\"probably_nsfw\":false,\"high_probably_nsfw\":false,\"responsible_nsfw\":true,\"data\":{\"hentai\":0.0000018745902252703672,\"neutral\":0.9998550415039062,\"pornography\":0.0000746770019759424,\"sexy\":0.00006828152254456654,\"predictedLabel\":\"neutral\"},\"url\":\"url\"}]",

"tags": [

[

"d",

"nostr-nsfw-classification"

],

[

"t",

"nostr-nsfw-classification"

],

[

"e",

"58bd02d8c46eaa6f1598d5eff7cb33c06ff57c4c9ad3dad32ae2b70d3258f661"

],

[

"p",

"5fd004926969381ac2bb3a32720036d9f9632d29fb22dc1bf5d8fb1c9e265798"

]

]

}

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.