nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m jaaaaacckk!
is this now possible? please translate for us. is this real?! 
Discussion
Just means more data being sent.
🙏 omg, thank you ~so~ much. the article perfectly explains what i was wondering about.
For anyone else reading this:
the new apple pods are just over the threshold to be considered lossless.
“Lossless audio is always presented in the CD-quality resolution of 16-bit/44.1kHz or better and may go all the way up to 24-bit/192kHz.”
lol, oops…but i guess only when paired with the 1 million dollar goggles.
Article is old
dear jacks,
let’s be clear. as i know now from our sources on nostr and the internet at large, it seems that wireless lossless audio is pretty much still ~not possible~
apple waz dropping a meaningless teaser❗️😑
jaaaaack! the world ~needs~ lossless on wireless. please do something.
HIGH p r i o r i t y ‼️
🥹🙏🧡
Lol
you are pathetic and disgusting.
i say this as a lifelong audiophile.
( as opposed to a wannabe embarrassment like you )
Actually they do support the Lossless Audio, except it’s limited for the Vision Pro only. 
ty🙏 & yeah 😔, i realized later after learning about the bits/kHz spec and reading that more carefully, but the goggles make the pods’ losslessness pointless to me, lol 🥲
so what happens if the audio is lossless? it just plays the standard version and you can't really tell either way, right?
i think something like that…
sound quality was ~significantly~ better with my old wired headphones when listening to high “resolution” audio files, cd’s…
now, my bluetooth headphones, even though it’s a comp in terms of price-point, just are not at all capable of delivering the quality of sound i heard before with wired.
lossless was a thing 20 years ago. what are you a fucking boomer ?