stocks are not money, they are a loan to a company

land is only as valuable as its various money-making benefits provide... location is central, because it lowers the key energy cost of transport, and relative to the biggest amount of customers is another aspect of this, there is many, and then there is what you can actually do with the land, such as flat land being good for cities or fields of corn or herds of cattle, whereas slopey land is maybe useful for hunting or tourism

nothing can change the fact that neither of these types of property have moneyness, and it is only fiat that by its constant debasement makes their relative moneyness higher against cash than it otherwise would be

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'd only quibble that a stock is supposed to be ownership of a company. But I know you know that...

private equity is that, you can go to a court with a claim about that

public equity is still casino chips. you go to the SEC, who are not a court

Ah yeah, the preferred stock scam... Isn't it remarkable how people have inserted these little exceptions and rules into everything to benefit themselves at the public's expense?

Well if I was king of the world.... Lots of amazing things would happen... And one would be that stocks can't be issued again after their creation and there would be no separate classes of stock for one company. This shits dishonest...