The other day I was met with, “If Trump didn’t want to get convicted, he shouldn’t have broken the law.”

From a Covid vaxx hysteric, trust the sciencer, of course. The legality=morality crowd. The 65% of the Milgram study. A quite successful person.

“If the Jew didn’t want to get sent to the camp, they should’ve followed the law.”

“If the comrade didn’t want to get sent to the gulag, they shouldn’t have disobeyed the Politburo.”

“If the slave didn’t want to get sent back to the plantation and whipped, they shouldn’t have ran away.”

“You don’t need privacy if you have nothing to hide.”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You had me rolling at 65%. I’m going to start calling them 65%ers

Few

Of all the crimes former US presidents have committed, they go after Trump.

I just read and pictured:

"The other day I was met with..."

It was low-hanging fruit. Why wouldn't they?

Are you really expecting any charges to be levied on other Presidents, for both real as well as imagined crimes?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

They play a completely different game than us, and here people are bitching about the fact that one, just ONE, of them was finally caught.

Also, it's unprecedented because, checks notes, /It's never happened before/, which is the literal definition of the word. Everyone opposing Trump's conviction needs more Merriam-Webster in their life.

I also find it laughable that the party of #lawandorder doesn't understand what the fuck a jurisdiction is.

Any further bloviating in support of the 34x convicted felon should be labeled as blowjobs, because that's the substantive effort behind it.