You’re actually growing on me. Loved the Newton reference.

Don’t shed a tear for me though. I believe bitcoin will succeed, but even if it didn’t, I’ve funded IVF with bitcoin “gainz” and have two beautiful children from it.

Bitcoin is far more than just “gainz” though. It’s a movement. A movement towards rooting out the completely corrupt and unfair monetary system that has served the people closest to the printers. I genuinely believe it’s our last shot at real freedom.

When people have their CBDC’s, those same people won’t be looking to bitcoin for the “gainz” they’ll be looking at it as the only viable option to spend the value that they’ve earned on the goods and services they wish to obtain.

If you’re into Austrian economics, I can’t understand why you’re so against bitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm against Bitcoin because of the grand unified centralized ledger, selling itself as decentralized when it's really just distributed. Every resilient centralized database out there is hosted on dozens, hundreds or thousands of nodes. What makes a data layer 'centralized' is that each node tries to sync up to the same, single authoritative global state, like Twitter or Facebook or Bitcoin's CDN.

What makes a data layer 'decentralized' like Nostr is that there are dozens or hundreds of unique databases, with no conception of a single authoritative global state, and no requirement in the protocol to sync up to the same version.

In short, I think CBDC's are the bogeyman and BTC is their plan. You can't solve the Byzantine Generals problem without centralizing something, and Bitcoin centralized the most dangerous thing to economic freedom: The ledger.