I've been watching a debate between Peter Schiff and Raoul Pal, along with a similar one featuring Jack Mallers nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle . It seems to me that Schiff's arguments can be dismantled point by point, but they rarely are in these discussions.
Would it be helpful if I created a Peter Schiff argument crib-sheet for anyone preparing to engage with him in interviews?
My only hesitation is that he'll likely just produce more fluff, as he has with his current baseless arguments.