I can understand that, but I have regularly found that GM posts, and controversial content tends to acquire more replies than high-quality content.

Taking any interaction at face value in a recommendation system is going to cause issues, over and over. Context matters.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Alternative approach?

Analyzing content based on context.

I had worked on a Nostr content recommendation system about 2 years ago, and it was pretty accurate.

I’m considering eventually resuming this after I finish more important stuff.

Eventually we’ll need to use a system like this. In the meantime, on our Web app we provide alternative trending feeds including a trending w/o “GM” messages

They still use the same metric value system but we‘ve found them to be less spammy