Yes but isn't that simply moving the goalposts of what "self-custodial" means? (Note, I didn't reply on your thread, just thinking out loud." Self custody refers to funds. Self-sovereign may be a better term for what you're expecting of people. And in that case, how can a web domain ever truly be self sovereign when ultimately they're controlled by centralized entities?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Perhaps a question for the thinkboi philosophers

I think you gotta custody the webserver, no cloud hosting even allowed

True self custody involves a mnemonic encrypted to the individual's DNA such that sats cannot be spent short of Seppuku