Jiang Bing He's Second Suggestion for President Trump in the 2024 Election 我对川普 @realDonaldTrump 总统未来四个月竞选的第二次建议：不要仅限于对拜登认知障碍纠缠而要阐述民主党政策和执政错误与扭曲；【没有拜登无耻的政治追杀、就不会有最高法院大法官关于“总统豁免权”司法解释！】防止选举作弊。
Jiang Bing He's Second Suggestion for President Trump in the 2024 Election
To President Trump and the Republican National Committee:
Firstly, I would like to congratulate President Trump for his relatively normal performance in the first round of the debate with Biden at the end of June, and express my respect for the Supreme Court for upholding the Constitution and adhering to the original intent of Congress's legislation. These are the first steps toward reversing America's direction toward a normal nation. The next four months will be even more challenging, especially against the unprincipled far-left Democrats. Their tactics, including distorting facts and particularly manipulating elections, will likely intensify. The Republican Party and President Trump's campaign team should be particularly vigilant and appropriately resist these tactics.
The problem with the Democratic Party lies in policy errors and governance distortions, not in Biden’s frail physical condition.
There is no doubt that Biden has shown clear signs of aging, with issues in his cognitive and expressive abilities, and confused logic. This should not be the focus of the presidential debates—yet the media, particularly left-leaning outlets like The New York Times and CNN, have shifted the focus to Biden’s physical condition, with high-ranking Democrats including Pelosi joining in. Suppose, in the second debate, Biden, energized by his doctors’ efforts and his own, performs vigorously like he did during the State of the Union address in February; the focus would then be diffused, which would be extremely disadvantageous for Trump's campaign.
The majority of American voters should focus on the Democratic Party’s disastrous policies and governance:
1. Inflation: During Trump’s presidency (except for the second quarter of 2020 due to the unprecedented pandemic), the economy maintained high growth, low inflation (low prices), and relatively low unemployment. Most American residents feel that the quality of life during Biden’s four years is far inferior to that of Trump’s four years. Biden’s energy policies and excessive, unnecessary stimulus policies have triggered inflation in the United States, which in turn has led to inflation in Europe and major market economies—contributing to changes in leadership in countries like the UK, Australia, South America, and New Zealand. At the beginning of his tenure in 2021, Biden revoked the U.S.-Canada pipeline, banned the extraction of oil and natural gas on federal lands, and restricted offshore oil, natural gas, and shale gas extraction, leading to increased energy prices. As I predicted in a Hong Kong newspaper article in December 2020, rising oil prices would lead to increased prices for industrial and agricultural products. As President Trump mentioned in the debate, inflation is caused by Biden’s radical environmental policies—actually hypocritical environmental policies. Transporting crude oil by car and train instead of using the U.S.-Canada pipeline is less environmentally friendly, less cost-effective, and more damaging to the environment. After the COVID-19 pandemic was brought under control, the Democratic-controlled House and Senate continued to stimulate the economy financially, distributing money indiscriminately, increasing ineffective investments under the guise of curbing inflation, and providing various subsidies to enterprises that did not need them with taxpayers’ money.
2. Border Disaster: After taking office, Biden revoked President Trump’s border restriction orders, allowing a large number of illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. at the U.S.-Mexico border, leading to an influx of drug traffickers, human traffickers, rapists, robbers, and even terrorists, according to the FBI. In the debate, Biden cited the example of an illegal immigrant who raped and murdered an American female student; there are many such cases. What is even more incomprehensible is the tolerance of illegal immigrants in California and New York City, controlled by the Democratic Party: illegal immigrants committing robberies are released upon arrest, ultimately leading to the killing of police officers and innocent American citizens by illegal immigrants. In addition to their criminal activities, a significant proportion of illegal immigrants do not work and live idly, yet the Democratic government arranges for them to stay in hotels, enjoying better social welfare and medical conditions than citizens and permanent residents. Biden was occasionally honest; he pointed out in the presidential debate that the Democratic government destroyed the U.S. medical system. Of course, Biden was a bit modest; the Democratic government has destroyed much more than the medical system: the education system, traditional culture, American values, and the rule of law, among others.
3. Undermining the Rule of Law: The U.S. rule of law seems specifically set up against law-abiding conservatives and Republicans while being lenient towards illegal immigrants and Democrats. This is especially evident in the extreme political persecution of President Trump. Both Biden and Trump took classified documents home, but Biden was let off by prosecutors due to his old age, while Biden eight years ago was younger than Trump is now. Hillary Clinton also leaked national secrets but was not prosecuted—she did not have presidential immunity, and neither did Biden eight years ago. The most excessive part is Attorney General Garland not only ordered the search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate but also gave the FBI orders to shoot Trump if he resisted. Conservative advisors to Trump, Navarro and Bannon, are serving prison sentences for “contempt of Congress,” while Biden’s son Hunter, despite appearing in court, arrogantly dismissed questioning from Congress members and walked away. This man, who illegally possessed firearms, used drugs, and engaged in inappropriate relationships, received benefits from hostile countries while Biden was Obama’s vice president. Yet, he did not go to jail for contempt of court because Biden is proud of him. Trump, accused of “misreporting assets,” saw his loans fully repaid with no victims, but the New York prosecutor pursued criminal charges, froze his assets, and awarded a large sum for defamation despite the rape charges not being upheld. Meanwhile, the New York prosecutor was signing release documents for robbers among illegal immigrants, indirectly supporting them in becoming murderers.
Beware of left-wing distortions of Supreme Court rulings: Conservatives respect the ruling that abortion rights are determined by states, and presidential immunity is not absolute.
In 2022, the Supreme Court, following constitutional principles, overturned Roe v. Wade, returning the decision on abortion rights to the states. Left-wing media (now seen as leftist propaganda machines and Democratic Party mouthpieces) and Democrats claim that Republicans want to ban abortion nationwide in the U.S. After the presidential debate, Vice President Kamala Harris wrote that Trump, if elected, would issue a nationwide “abortion ban.” Elon Musk labeled this post as misinformation, without deleting it or banning the account. Below the post, many left-wing media links were added, clarifying that Trump explicitly stated during the debate that he would not sign such a ban and that abortion rights are decided by states, fully respecting the Supreme Court’s ruling. Due to the abusive litigation and political persecution against Trump, he appealed to the Supreme Court, requesting an interpretation of his presidential immunity during his term. This is unprecedented in American history, as no president has ever faced impeachment without evidence, both during and after their term; Trump has faced both criminal and civil lawsuits post-presidency. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that President Trump enjoys broad immunity, but not absolute immunity. This ruling is significant not only for Trump but for all current and former presidents, preventing scenarios like in immature democracies where a president is celebrated in office but jailed upon leaving. It is certain that Democrats will extensively propagandize and exaggerate the scope of presidential immunity. Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor has already signaled to the radical left in her dissent, expressing her “concern for democracy” by stating, “Though a nightmarish scenario has never occurred, the harm is done, and the president is now a king above the law in every aspect of wielding official power.” She listed extreme scenarios like ordering the SEAL Team Six to assassinate political rivals or organizing a military coup to retain power, all supposedly covered by immunity. In response to such outrageous claims, Chief Justice Roberts calmly told Sotomayor, “You’re overthinking it.” To which I would add, perhaps he is underestimating the extremism of the Democratic left. Without a doubt, left-wing propaganda will portray Trump as a dictator using presidential immunity to rule the U.S. The collective ruling by the justices clarified three scenarios: the president has complete immunity when performing constitutional duties; presumed immunity when executing related official duties; and no immunity for private actions. For example, the president has complete immunity in appointing executive officials, nominating cabinet members and justices, and granting federal criminal pardons. Sotomayor’s concerns about presidential abuse, treason, and other crimes naturally fall under congressional impeachment and removal, even criminal charges. This is why Justice Roberts dismissed her concerns, but not all left-wing supporters are more knowledgeable about law and institutional limitations than Sotomayor. The Supreme Court’s clarification of presidential immunity essentially formalizes past unwritten rules, without significantly expanding presidential powers but removing unnecessary constraints and preventing post-office political persecution. This is forced by Biden and his team’s bottomless actions! No prior American president has politically persecuted a former president, including Trump, who did not. Biden might be the only exception! [Without Biden’s shameless political persecution, there wouldn’t have been a Supreme Court interpretation of “presidential immunity”!] Trump should not overly emphasize presidential immunity but highlight its limits. He could joke about himself, mentioning how he lost a court case and had to restore a CNN reporter’s White House pass after canceling it during his presidency, or how he was ordered by a court to unblock hostile followers on Twitter (now X) during his term. These examples show that the president does not have unlimited immunity; if he can’t even block followers, how could he order military killings as Sotomayor suggests? Trump needs to clarify that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of presidential immunity did not change presidential powers before or after the ruling, past or future. He could never commit illegal acts before, and this won’t change in the future. Such actions are unimaginable, only considered by left-wing justices and presidents.
Finally, it is crucial to invest more funds and Republican personnel in election certification, ballot monitoring, and counting, especially in battleground states. Good luck to Trump and the Republicans!
2024年大选贺江兵对川普总统的第二个建议
川普总统并美国共和党全国委员会：
首先，我对6月底拜登与川普总统辩论会第一轮中，川普总统较为正常的表现表示祝贺，对美国最高法院秉承尊重宪法和国会的立法本意的遵守表示敬意。这些，都是扭转美国朝着正常国家方向前进的第一步，更艰难的在以后四个月，可以说对于没有底线的极左民主党来说，战胜他们充满挑战，他们会在颠倒事实、尤其欺诈选举等方面更加疯狂，共和党和川普总统竞选团队尤其应该防范和适度抵制。
民主党的问题是政策错误和执政扭曲而不是拜登的虚弱的身体
毫无疑问，拜登的身体出现明显的衰老，他的认知能力、表达能力出现问题，逻辑胡乱。这一点不应该成为总统辩论会的焦点——然而，媒体特备是左派媒体纽约时报、CNN等都把问题的焦点转移到拜登的身体上，美国民主党高层甚至佩洛西等也加入了进来。这里假设一下，如果第二次辩论，拜登因为医生们和自身的努力下，如同二月份在国情咨文打鸡血一样亢奋表演，焦点就一下化解掉了，对川普竞选极其不利。
美国大多数选民更应该将选举的重点关注在民主党糟糕的政策和执政上来：
1，通货膨胀。在川普总统任内（除了2020年二季度因为百年未见的大流行外）经济保持了高速发展、低通胀（低物价）和较低失业率，大多数美国居民觉得拜登四年生活质量远不及川普那四年。
拜登的能源政策和过多不必要的刺激政策引发美国通货膨胀爆发，从而引发欧洲和主要市场经济体出现通胀——顺带让英国、澳大利亚、南美、新西兰等国家出现现任领导人更换。
拜登在2021年上任伊始就废除了美国——加拿大管道，禁止联邦土地上开采石油、天然气等，限制近海石油、天然气和页岩气开采，导致能源价格上涨。正如我在2020年12月在香港报纸上发文预测的那样，石油价格的上涨会带动工业品和农产品价格上涨，正如川普总统辩论中所说，通胀是拜登激进的环保政策——实际上是虚伪的环保政策引发的，不用美加石油管道运输原油，用汽车和火车运送更不环保、更不节省费用，对环境破坏更大。
在新冠大流行被控制后，民主党控制的众议院和参议院继续在财政上刺激经济，没有节制的发钱，打着遏制通胀的名义增加无效投资；还有各种用纳税人的钱给不需要钱的企业提供补贴等。
2，边境灾难。拜登上任后就废除了川普总统的边境限制禁令，在美墨边境放入大量非法移民入境，导致一些毒贩、人贩子、强奸犯、抢劫犯、甚至FBI声称恐怖分子大量涌入美国。
如辩论会中，拜登提到的例子：一个非法移民强奸后杀害了一名美国女学生，这样的案例还有很多。更让人不可思议的是，美国民主党把持的加州和纽约市等地对非法移民的纵容：对于非法移民抢劫抓了就释放，最终导致警察和无辜美国公民被非法移民杀害。
除了为非作歹，很大比重的非法移民不工作、游手好闲却被民主党政府安排进酒店，享受比公民和永久居民更好的社会福利和医疗条件。拜登偶尔是诚实的，他在总统辩论会上指出：民主党政府摧毁了美国医疗系统。当然，拜登有点谦虚，民主党政府摧毁的远不止医疗系统：还有教育系统、传统文化、美国价值观和法治等等。
3，正在摧毁法治。美国的法治视乎为专门对付热爱美国、遵纪守法的保守派和共和党人设立；对违法犯罪的非法移民和民主党人不使用。尤其是在对川普总统的政治迫害登峰造极，同样机密文件案，拜登和川普都有带回，拜登因为年事已高被检察官放过，八年前的拜登还没有现在的川普年纪大，希拉里文件门泄露国家机密也安然度过——希拉里并不享有总统豁免权，八年前的拜登也没有。过分的是：司法部长加兰不仅仅以搜查川普海湖庄园，还对FBI对川普反抗就地击毙命令。
保守派川普的顾问纳瓦罗和班农因为“藐视国会”罪正在监狱服刑，而拜登的儿子亨特虽然出庭却对提问的国会议员提问不屑一顾，扬长而去。这位非法持枪、吸毒和与嫂子鬼混从敌对国家拿好处——当时拜登是奥巴马副总统，因为拜登为亨特而骄傲，而没有因藐视法庭而坐牢。
川普因为“虚报财产”贷款银行收回了本息没有受害者，纽约检察官却进行刑事起诉，并被天假冻结资产；在强奸罪名不成立前提下被判名誉侵权巨额赔偿；在没有证据和整理有利情况下罗织荒唐罪名判决川普有罪。而纽约检察官这时候正在对非法移民的抢劫犯签署释放文书，为他们变成杀人犯提供支撑。
警惕左派歪曲最高法院判决：保守派遵守判决堕胎权州定、总统豁免权非无限
2022年最高法院依照宪法原则，推翻“罗诉韦德案”对堕胎权下放原本属于州权的各州决定。
而左派媒体（现在可以视作左派宣传机器和民主党党报）和民主党人宣称共和党在美国全国禁止堕胎。
副总统贺锦丽在总统辩论会后在其写到：川普一旦当选总统，会颁布全国范围内的“禁止堕胎令”。马斯克给此贴标注为造谣贴，没有删除，也没有封禁账户。随后其下面标注了很多左媒的链接，川普总统在辩论会上明确说过不会签署，堕胎权各州决定完全遵守最高法院判决。
鉴于对川普总统滥诉和政治追杀，川普总统上诉到最高法院，要求对其任内总统豁免权进行释法。这是美国历史上从没出现过的，因为，从来没有一个在任时和离任后遭到没有证据的弹劾——并且二次；卸任后依然遭到刑事和民事起诉的总统。最高法院最终判决川普总统享有广泛的豁免权，但是，并非全部豁免。这不仅仅对川普总统意义重大，对所有的在任和离任总统都是有划时代重要意义，这避免了不成熟民主国家那样在任是风光总统、下台就进监狱戏码。可以百分之一百的确定民主党人会大肆宣传语渲染总统完全豁免权，“自由派”大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔（Sonia Sotomayor）已经在最高法院给激进左派做了明示，她在判决不同意见书中写道：她“对民主的担忧”，指“尽管噩梦般的情况从没发生，但伤害已经造成，总统在使用官方权力的每一个方面，现在都是凌驾于法律之上的国王”。“命令海豹六队刺杀政敌？豁免。组织军事政变以保住权力？豁免。接受贿赂以换取赦免？豁免。豁免，豁免，豁免。”
对于这种疯狂的指责，首席大法官罗伯茨平静的对索托马约尔说：“你想多了。”我想对罗伯茨大法官说：可能对疯狂的民主党极左派想的太正常了。 毫无疑问，左派宣传机器会渲染川普上台就会凭借总统豁免权成为美国的独裁国王。
大法官集体判决中明确了三种情况：总统在执行宪法职责是现有完全豁免权；执行相关公务享有推定豁免权；在私人行为中没有豁免权。
比如，总统在任命行政官员、提名内阁成员、大法官、对联邦刑事罪的豁免等都有完全豁免权。索托马约尔所指的是总统滥权、叛国等犯罪行为，自然有国会提出弹劾罢免甚至判刑。这是罗伯茨法官不屑一顾的原因，可是并非所有的左派群众都比索托马约尔更懂法律和制度限制啊！
最高法院明确总统豁免权事实上是过去的潜规则被成了明规则，没有太多给总统扩权，而是对其工作解除了必要的加锁和避免卸任后政治追杀而已。是被拜登和其团伙的没有底线逼出来的！拜登之前的全部美国在任总统没有政治追杀过前总统，包括川普总统也没有，有可能只会有拜登！【没有拜登无耻的政治追杀、就不会有最高法院大法官关于“总统豁免权”司法解释！】
川普不应该再过度渲染总统豁免权，而是强调不能豁免部分。可以拿自己开玩笑，比如川普自己在当总统的时候取消CNN记者进出白宫签证，法院判决川普败诉恢复记者进出；同样在总统任内，在Twitter（现在的X）上拉黑了不友好粉丝，被法院判决败诉后，乖乖的从小黑屋解禁了拉黑。等等，这些表明总统并没有无限豁免权，拉黑粉丝都不能，怎么能像索托马约尔说的动用军队杀人？
川普还需要阐述清楚一点，最高法院解释总统豁免权限之前与之后、过去与未来，总统的权限没有任何变化。过去不能做违法的事儿，今后一样不会。想都不敢想，只有左派大法官和左派总统做过想过。
最后，至关重要的是对全境尤其是战斗州的选举认证、选票各国环节监管、计票等方面做更多的资金和共和党人员投入。希望川普和共和党好运！ 
