Subnostr

Replying to nobody

like yea i can tell you to me? i would buy that painting because the claim that it is genuine is true as far as i can see

or dude not a chance not even close that is hoax on hoax forgery

or what a smile, this forgery has so much artistry all its own i love it who even needs the og artist when this is better hell yea for the anon painting

science does not stand for that like a curator does

so we can see a much wider divergence here downstream

science is like: this painting is going under an electron microscope. if we do not have methods yet we will make them. if we do not have tools yet we will make them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

curator like: you are missing the point

imagine misusing a painting

a painting is for enjoyment

for display

for people to experience it

science: sorry im not a trophy hunter i care about truth not acquisition

sometimes siblings disagree

that fight is on worthy grounds

places of:

agree to disagree

is some of the most critical gravity weight bearing math there is

those agree to disagree places are hallowed ground

never ever in a mild way like not scary

so normal

but truly never go for full alignment

no full alignment

no full facade

no: it is resolved entirely

because that is immensely disrespectful

~that~ is eating the children

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronus

do not go full cronut

donut? that's fine

cronut? ❌