Nostr Web Client

Guy who murdered Iryna Zarutska claims the government “put materials in his body” and caused him to do it. Don’t throw me in a mental institution, but I’m not ruling out that he’s telling the truth at some level.

Whole thing was just way too on the nose. (Ukrainian refugee, looks like Marylin Monroe, guy says “got the white girl” on camera). If you wanted to stoke racial division, it couldn’t get more perfect. The Charlie Kirk assassination is also radicalizing, even if it’s not some angry leftist but a professional hit job.

They did 9/11 the day after the Pentagon failed an audit wherein $2T had gone missing. This is going down just as the pharmaceutical companies are being called to account in Congress.

I don’t know what’s true, but I do have a sense when I’m being manipulated by now.

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1965763043985391786

5a92611b... 4mo ago

Iryna Zarutska decided on her own to sit right in front of him. How could he have known that she was going to sit there if it was premeditated?

My opinion:

- her murder was unexpected

- it starts to awaken people on the great replacement, insecurities from illegal immigration and white culture destruction

- MSMs try to hide the news and its consequences (potential “White Lives Matter” movement)

- Charlie Kirk seems to be the ideal candidate to lead this movement (he started on his X account before he died)

- the killer seems to be a professional

- now that he is dead it has replaced the murder of Iryna Zarutska on people's mind and emotions

If this is sort of true they are very fast and effective at keeping the mass dormant and manipulating their emotions

Now the momentum is gone

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Telluride 4mo ago

I think martyring Kirk will only help the conservative cause.

—Its not a price I’d have paid to accomplish it but I feel confident that this didn’t help the shitlib movement.

I also think the deep state did this and it’s not left/right motivated.

This is similar to 9/11 and other high profile assassinations.

"Cui bono?" is a Latin phrase that translates to "to whom is it a benefit?" or more commonly in English, "who benefits?"

It's often used as a principle in investigations, debates, or critical thinking to suggest that the person or party who stands to gain the most from an action is likely responsible for it.

For example:

9/11

Who benefited? Muslims? I think not. Who benefited from making the entire world hate muslims?

It’s obvious when you take a moment.

🧡👊🏻🍻