Replying to Deleted Account

Very very hard to do. You have to consider the second/third order attack vectors and if we head down a path of 'arbitrary filtration' now in an entire rational manner then that can quickly (or slowly) metastasise into a complete loss of fungibility down the track. But as I said I might very well know nothing (and in that humbling realisation I remain conservatively inactive).
Avatar
FreeYoda 4mo ago

That is why we need to keep some things simple.

No other data onchain or in blocks untill we all agree it is needed and tested.

It is time to freeze the #Bitcoin release.

I haven't heard of any thing that can't be solved in other layers like LN did.

#Bitcoin is a Protocol, it works, it doing its thing, stable and predictable is the highest priority.

If there is need to fuck around there are millions of shitcoins be my guest, we don't have a need to find out...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

f8
Deleted Account 4mo ago

I think these are all great points and I would philosophically agree with you (so long as I eventually get trustless covenants in a way that's cost effective, secure and harmless to the base protocol).

The thing I'm not convinced by is the stability of Luke's mind and clarity on the level of control he has over the direction of knots.

I'm looking for calm, rational, conservative, strategic and respectful leadership.

I need to dig deeper though so thanks for replying to me - it's appreciated. 🙏