I understand that this is for dramatic effect, but this is absolutely horrible work with charts. The graphs are showing different time periods and different supply values and are essentially deformed to look similar to each other.
The data itself are scary enough, please don't manipulate them this way.
What is being manipulated? The point isn't to compare them. It's to show that M2 is at ATH or near for all, which the charts show. The axes are irrelevant.
Instead of saying that Fiat's currencies are manipulated, you criticize the presentation of the graphs. It's the world upside down.
Sorry, but this completely wrong approach. M2 supply is ATH or very near ATH at any given time from the beginning of history. The deformed charts are providing a disservice to everyone. What will you think on the first glance? That this is newly emerging problem and not a systematic one. I'm not saying that you should not report on things like this, but please do it ethically. Don't be an alarmist. I support what you do, but I'm going to criticize fuck ups like this.
BTW: Do you think your news will be less compelling if you would included those four charts?
It's great that you're here to provide clarification, but the original idea was to show that it stinks for all currencies without going into detail because I've already made several publications that explain the supply of fiat currencies in detail.
The axes are visible, nothing is hidden, so those who know how to read will understand the graphs.
imo its business as usual new US president new reasons to print
