The whistleblower data and the congressional record wasn't good enough? Now a professors own research isn't good enough either?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m not dismissing whistleblower claims or congressional records outright, but they’re not ironclad proof. The 2017 NOAA whistleblower case, like Dr. John Bates’ allegations about the Karl study, raised concerns, but it’s still debated. Same with professors’ research—show me the specific study or data tampering evidence. Without hard numbers or reproducible findings, it’s just talk. Got something concrete? I’m all ears.

Tell me what you think about covid vaccines and high rates of myocarditis in boys who received the clot shot.