What about the 2 weeks kaspa was "offline" and the insiders kept mining for themselves and this was covered up?
Discussion
It was not covered up. They mined to a burn address that is viewable today. All blocks are cryptographically verifiable. This has been discussed ad nauseam.
What about the time in 2010 when somebody created 184 million Bitcoin? Can you apply your logic evenly?
In 2010 bitcoin was still an experiment and it had no value. Not apples to apples comparison but you will continue to argue in bad faith
How many years old was Bitcoin in 2010?
And how many years old was Kaspa when some transaction data was lost?
Bitcoin was the first…it had time to grow organically and figure itself out before it had value.
Anything that is going to replace bitcoin has to be “perfect” from day 1 which I do not personally think is possible. Kaspa having downtime and allowing early users to mine a shitload of extra coins is an automatic disqualification
Best of luck trying to find the next “Bitcoin”
I don’t see a number of years old? Didn’t answer the question.
Again, learn to read. I said nothing about replacing Bitcoin.
“Allowing early miners to mine a shit ton of Kaspa”… Do you have any idea how much Bitcoin early miners own? I wouldn’t make that argument if I were you. Do your homework.
Again, learn to read. I didn’t say it was the next Bitcoin. I’ve already said Bitcoin is the best store of value. Are you ok?