Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar 7fqx

I would say either of the two except B.

B comes across as too generic, ital could be any number of alt twitter's, no info there and I wouldn't click or scroll beyond that.

I think there's a lot of generic design slop everywhere and it's really not eye catching at all. This could be an advert for a bank account or a migraine relief tablet etc etc. it's become very background.

So at least A and C actually have some info to read.

I think I general nostr people should look at something like farcaster's pages and marketing. Would you click on it, scroll more? Probably not. That is how a non-nostr user sees the nostr equivalent. Farcaster marketing also looks and reads like generic slop (slight aside: is everyone writing using ChatGPT or does it just seem like this?). People see slop and ignore it.

It's quite a difficult task actually. I would probably pick the least 'slick' slop options available as a general rule.

Avatar
jurraca 1y ago

B is low on info but at least it has tinge of weird. A & C could be any startup's page about any product. Our aesthetics have to relate our philosophy more than the words imo.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
7fqx 1y ago

Not seeing anything 'weird' in B. The aesthetic, colour palette, and words are all pretty generic (imo!).

Thread collapsed