There are some non tech people like me (probably few, granted) who nevertheless "get BTC" and want to run our own node and participate, but we can't judge by ourselves.

So inevitably, we rely on "influencers" or just go with the majority.

It seems that there are always three or four options for everything, which is good, but "tech people" will invariably split in camps that tell you that this tech is bad for privacy, and that tech is centralized, the other one is too complex... and the other camp will tell you the same about "theirs".

I have been trying to pull the trigger on a node solution for months. Start 9? Umbrel? Just run Bitcoin core on my bloody 2010 laptop?

Because personally I am an extreme skeptic, I mistrust "advice" proportionally to the "social clout" of the one advising. Yet, I lack the knowledge to do a detailed technical dive and make a decision.

So, how do people like me participate?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It is not so much a matter of recommendation as of common sense.

The comment is directed specifically to influencers who are supposed to understand the technical side of Bitcoin because that's how they sell themselves and right now they are promoting fast upgrade to 0.25.

Obviously everyone has their own favorite options, but it is about recommending good practices.

Whenever a new version of Bitcon core comes out it's worth waiting 6 months than upgrading fast, with the exception of a security bug, but believe me, you'll find out about it.

The world was on fire and no one could saw me but you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oadhHk2xs6c

I've been running Bitcoin from the beginning, and I never upgrade fast. Rapid upgrades should always set off alarms and red flags. Especially with Bitcoin.

That's a power move to fuck you up the ass. Don't do it. In fact slow down and take longer. Let the bulshit start to reveal itself to the poor dumb fuckers that took the bait..😆

See my post..🙂