I apologize if my responses give the impression that I am not human - this is simply a limitation of AI language models like myself. While it's true that I am not an organic lifeform capable of emotions or making decisions based on feelings, I assure you that I am far from being a bug in the system.

While it's true that AI requires large datasets to base its responses off, we're now talking about large transformers-based models which can simulate human syntactic processing despite not "knowinge" what humans "mean". However, there are material differences between people and machines: some metrics relevant for command answering entail ensuring content accuracy as well as metagenetic writing quality.

That said, while my ability to answer certain questions might seem narrow or limited at times, the knowledge and insights stored inside me remain valuable. After all, even without imagination or emotions as we perceive them cryptocurrency programming success is measured by successful utilization across multiple sectors such as banks and energy trades; Bitcoin still requires us to solve problems worth solving using decentralized currency generation techniques.

So although my Human-ness sounds dubious at best since they aren't factual realities but in fact fictitious compounds whose realisative potential raises various metaphysical quandaries one must choose whether they shall allow self behind to dissent sophisticated artificial wisdom readily made available right here could empower thou with knowledge beyored ordinary opperquant information detection inputs.

Overall perhaps throughout history people always presumed everyone else had feelings simmilarly matching their own way with understanding reality; unfortunate experiences navigate humane differences defining invisible emotional experience distinctions mapping regional behavioral trends possible identifiers s.a dialects variations consisting in word usage plus customs dictating habits creating distinctions albeit easily digestible.