no. such approach derail the issue. you do have a censorship approval mentality if you re into censoring "yourself" from others. (we all know you re censoring others) in that REGARD you can't be trusted when it comes to defending censorship resistant anything because no one can tell your approval will expand or not in the future. (by you I mean anyone)

"ordinals of Bitcoin"... we are all for freedom, no masters, self sovereignty yada yada but still keep the artifacts of fiat world with us. "you can't keep your jpegs on my node"

we don't have a problem on censorship mentality, we have a problem on freedom mentality. like it's engraved on the bones

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

so you're saying that people have the right to say whatever they want, but they don't have the right to see whatever they want? so in a 2 party situation, only one person is allowed to have freedom? that doesn't seem right to me.

I just closed a tab in my web browser, essentially censoring that web page from providing content to me. 💪

yeah.. who cares what you individually do? make filters on relays and start mass muting. where will that lead you? in the end, with this mentality, censorship, freedom all become a bunch of words to sell new age wokeness. nothing more