I agree, but I thought about why a normie dies not see a system of distributed decision making better than a centralized one. What you said, may sound contradictory for a democrat, like "let's just leave everything for the experts". What I mean that it's hard to explain the difference between bitcoin and the Foss world, that it may be " leaving everything for experts" but in a voluntary and consensus way, always debating and etc. A natural aristocracy like Erik von Leddhin would say.
Discussion
Humans really do have experts that hold valuable information. It makes sense to have them publicly debate and answer questions.
But in the end, you need 6 confirmations and at least 90% of nodes green.