I'm just happy we're finally back to arguing about actually interesting conundrums like quantum risks rather than retarded bullshit like spam. 😎
Discussion
They are as tiresome and retarded. Hoping they fade with the same velocity.
You would be
Mmmmm….spammm
UASF incoming. Gtfo spammer.
Core is a shitcoin project now. #RunKnots
Then why don't you shut the fuck up about it?
QC is retard bait
The knots v core debate sure did die all of a sudden
You almost got first...I was rooting for you! Thanks for all you do for Bitcoin and enjoy some free sats!
Yes, I'd like to see some Bitcoiners who aren't beholden to university grants (cough nostr:nprofile1qqsrcn632cfyx5j0xpld9m389370ffuzgp8muwshvcrqgwm26sn7uacpzemhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvse30xkv cough) sink their teeth into quantum and tell us what's real and what isn't 👀
I'd love us to just get a soft fork for a new address type that people who want to can use.
I don't assume many would as it will cost more.
But it'd solve the problem and let us focus on something more important like CTV and CSFS.
Yea idk, I'm in no rush. This FUD will pass. Quantum isn't a legit risk IMHO.
The fake and gay quantum risks only seem to be a talking point that spammers promote.
Everyone on the anti spam side just calls it fud or whatever.
Because if quantum computing was a risk to Bitcoin, Bitcoin would be the least of our worries, the entire financial system would be destroyed first.
All encryption would be useless.
In that case Bitcoin doesn't matter, you'll be too focused on finding food to care about Bitcoin
Centralized systems can upgrade to post quantum cryptography orders of magnitude faster than Bitcoin can.
That's why Bitcoin has to be far more proactive about the threat than other industries.
Arguing about fake stuff instead of all the spam lopp wants node runners to host at their own expense