This seems to be a good take. Curious if anyone disagrees or has a counterpoint.
nostr:note1ehrxlha9j407dd23ge6cwzksh8yez40sza6zd0qw760egwfz6nesxaye35
This seems to be a good take. Curious if anyone disagrees or has a counterpoint.
nostr:note1ehrxlha9j407dd23ge6cwzksh8yez40sza6zd0qw760egwfz6nesxaye35
Nope. Spot on. It's adding complexity and costs unecessarily.
I see institutions adopting nostr multi-sig to address a similar need this purports to address.
First 4 paragraphs are spot on.
I disagree with the last one. The point of anchoring the DID and the DID Document on-chain is that there are no other external dependencies.
https://twitter.com/AsherHopp/status/1785840844895027507?t=VMJpO7W509AlNQ1_6Yu-qw 
Please elaborate on the dependencies part. External to what?
Agreed. I wonder if his relationship to the bitcoin mining council has anything to do with this.
Clear profit motive, no?
This is an intellectual honesty test for a lot of famous people in the #bitcoin community.
I think Preston just passed this test with this post.
Would be nice to watch who else calls out Saylor and who self censor themselves for spamming #bitcoin blockchain.
nostr:note18ffwnrvmpgq4h6gjz2um88kq32k4svrnpm6ydx7v98h5ydtc82fsu4wehy