Great stuff Pablo. From a principle perspective sounds great, but from realistic perspective people may not want to spend so much time and effort into research and writing, only for it to be edited out without substantiation. I was just sharing with Karnage about this wiki idea a week before this, so i am not sure if its related.

The cons of wiki is that it is favouring who backs it. The pros however is that it has several categories which makes it a bit more wholesome. It also supports secondary tier jobs for researchers and writers, and it encourages famous people or companies to circulate among their circles - all this little factors makes the tool itself a self marketing element - which is why it has 10 billion views a month.

I think the ideas behind diff biases are great be it human or human tuned LLMs. Even references and substantiations has its own bias unless if its hardcore evidence like wikileaks. But the challenge remains on the effort put in by someone completely being wiped out - as this can dissuade contributors.

But if you never try, never know. So no harm giving it a try and figuring it out as it goes. Good luck Pablo, it has a lot of potentials!