I don't know if we should be so quick to judge. nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgsprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqc267ea was hamstrung by his board at Twitter. Is it so impossible to happen elsewhere?
Discussion
Iām making the least assumptions here: Zuckerberg has gone on record twice (to my knowledge) distancing himself from what his company did after it became politically unpopular (Trump becoming president).
I think Jackās situation was different.
There are other possibilities.
He could of seen the error of his ways, unlikely but no one is beyond redemption.
In 2017 when he was forced to go to Congress, he could of been put in a closed door meeting and threatened to do things for the regime.
I personally would believe the second, because I don't know too many business owners that like cutting their profits out for ideology. And that's what Zuckerberg did to himself.
On the first point, yes, he could have seen the errors in his ways. I donāt disagree that he can redeem himself but shifting the blame itās not how one finds redemption. The timing also casts doubt on that theory, since itās all happening after he met with Trump at mar-a-lago.
His company WAS forced into compliance by the regime (COVID, Biden laptop, etc) after he was called by congress to come clean about the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Testifying in front of congress regarding the CA scandal did not stop him from working with the US government to manipulate the flow of information. On the contrary, he worked more closely with them.
Heās coming now and saying everything was someone elseās fault and that is what I find dishonest and irresponsible.
Why canāt he simply own up to his own mistakes? Was he asleep at the wheel at Meta at the time?
I'll give you that he is being a bitch about it