Yesterday Greenpeace released a "research" report asking financial institutions like Fidelity support changing Bitcoin's code from PoW to PoS

Let's dive in why this is in bad faith & #TheCodeisPerfect

GPs "research" is the usual misinformation abt how bitcoin works & energy use that has been debunked by *real* climate activists in Bitcoin

> 50% of Bitcoin's network is ZERO emissions, period. Emissions are DECLINING. Carbon NEGATIVE is coming. See batcoinz.com/beest/

GP is 'concerned' Bitcoin is accelerating a climate crisis, fueled by "Big Finance"

... If GP was truly concerned about the impact of Big Finance, they would focus on legacy finance's carbon emissions

If Greenpeace was acting in good faith, they would conduct 🍎:🍎 accounting, which shows that Bitcoin is #cleantech from a lower energy use & carbon emissions perspective

Bitcoin is a drop in the bucket vs the legacy system & stores of value it *replaces*

If Greenpeace was acting in good faith, they'd recognize that the carbon emissions associated w/ "Big Finance" from lending, underwriting, & investment activities are more than 700x higher than a financial institution’s direct emissions

If Greenpeace was acting in good faith, it would identify conflicts of interest

GP received $5M from Ripple's Chris Larsens, to launch the anti-bitcoin #ChangeTheCode campaign. Ripple benefits from the spread of misinformation against Proof of Work. See https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/change-the-code-campaign-against-bitcoin for more info

At the end of the day, #ProofOfStake systems will *never* fund the transition to a low carbon economy, which continues to suffer from underinvestment (see my thread on how bitcoin can help address this https://twitter.com/Crypto_Mags/status/1605845121811025920?t=Vyl25hwHLqZoXDXve9wyfw&s=19)

Bitcoin's #ProofofWork system is the *only* way to achieve a net negative outcome

Ultimately we have facts on our side & a growing arsenal of projects

From Texas, to LATAM, to Africa, #Bitcoin's helping accelerate #renewables, building sustainable microgrids, addressing methane emissions, reusing waste, & even protecting gorillas (https://medium.com/@mgronowska/mining-bitcoin-to-protect-gorillas-in-the-congo-6439c2c3cee3)

Bitcoin's code provides for an optimal environmental outcome. The elegance of Bitcoin is that it's based on a system of economic incentives

Thus economic incentives are built in to ⬇️ cost & ⬆️ revenue:

🔸️ ⬇️ waste (heat, energy, garbage) & find the cheapest sources of energy (increasingly renewables)

🔸️ optimize resources (eg grid resources)

🔸️ ⬆️ efficiency

🔸️ ⬇️ GHGs: carbon = traditional cost center

Instead of the "stick" (env regs), which haven't succeeded to date, Bitcoin is the carrot 🥕: economic incentives (mining rewards) to help achieve the transition to a low carbon economy.

Ergo the code is perfect as is!

Fin/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bitcoin is bad for the environment, but we need to transition to an all electric society...

nah

Nah...

LOL #TheCodeIsPerfect. Folks, I am telling you this code is perfect. It is like no other. It's so perfect, people will beg me to tell them it could be more perfect, and I'll say "NO IT CANNOT BE MORE PERFECT."

How do you typically respond to folks that claim programmable privacy would make Bitcoin better?

It could be better wrt privacy. L2 & L3 solutions like #[6] will increase privacy

Wrt the code is perfect, I mean PoW (not changing to PoS)

It is wrt changing the code to proof of stake, you're missing the point

No, I like #TheCodeIsPerfect! It's such a hyperbolic, Trumpy way to say "Nah".

Impossible anyhow.

Weird that dude paid $5 million for something that can be done for free

Well he has made enough off of dumping on the naive anyway. What's 5 mil to him when he can sell billions of his premined centralized Garbo.

Share.

Great info here. The bitcoin fud-buster.

Thanks for putting this together.

#[0]

Where's orangepeace? Bitcoin climate advocacy group

Greenpeace credibility.

Aaand its gone 🤣