The reason I'm not fully convinces SATS is the future is from my experiences from Pi mining, when an arrogant mod misspoke when I confronted them about the valueless fruitless timewasting shilling of their product and aggressive non user friendly moderation. I told them we should be happy when wallets go inactive and tokens get burned because it increases the value of existing supply, upon which the mod claimed those values 'get recycled back into the mining pool'. Sats are just so low in value as no one has the authority to issue them in like-for-like valuation of all BTC holders and has severe proof of liquidity issues at scale. So that all being said, i dont need sats, i need groceries... But I understand the role of being an active holder and distributor and custodian. But I cant build an economy on sats without knowing the value of its base as consumer traders. In any ways, its all in good fun, ultimately the economy can do it all with BTC only, since you can split decimals infinitely, but once again issues in equity is prevalent so for now it holds the line as a traditional hedge. Even Africa BTC pushers should know Africa is sceptical of adoption since we know who the backers are, the people who afforded and mined the most for free so it gets weighed in its ability to deliver more value than existing solutions but ultimately its hard to get excited about as it sounds like buzzwords for more scaled economic fuckery and we dont see the benefits.