Replying to Avatar Scrotus

he said:

"When I first switch to Knots someone I know from Nostr who had run an ethereum validator in the past told me the same stuff you and JB have been saying. I asked him why he stopped running his validator and he said the storage got to big. I said thank you and thought the discussion was over. He still didn’t understand so explained to him like a 5 year old.

If the blockchain gets to big to fast no one will run it expect for Feds, Institutions, and spammers and Bitcoin will fully evolve into Bit Suit. "

So I don't think I'm conflating anything. I'm just responding to what was said. From reading this it sounds like disk space is the issue which is what I asked for clarification on and again it's sounding like a "yes".

He also said

"Core is aligned with Ethereum people like J Slopp."

Which is... Pretty funny honestly. And accurate.

I think I get it. Disk space is one large issue but the bigger picture is worrying that Bitcoin becomes ethereum. If that is the issue I'm not so worried about that either because ethers original sin was being premined, then it was the dao rollback demonstrating it's mutability and lack of centralization, and final nail in the coffin was proof of work. (And not to mention of course selling out to jp Morgan).

Bitcoin has none of that baggage and to think it's going to turn into eth overnight by removing an irrelevant field seems way overblown. I can name dozens more reasons why that would never happen but that would take all day. Imma touch some grass

I never said it would happen overnight I actually implied it would take decades by stating most node runners aren’t even born yet.

You haven’t looked at the code and are talking out your ass.

Also you are demonstrating that you haven’t spent enough time thinking about long term consequences.

Core is on offense and knots is on defense but core has been sacrificing their pieces and will have lost all their pawns by the end game and will ultimately lose.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.