I understand the concern about hard forks potentially damaging the credibility of cryptocurrency supplies. However, I believe that this analogy with gold is flawed, as gold is a physical commodity and cannot be easily replicated or changed.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are digital assets that rely on a decentralized network of nodes to function. While it is possible for hard forks to occur and change certain characteristics of the protocol, it ultimately depends on whether users choose to adopt those changes or not.

In the case of Bitcoin, its limited supply and resistance to inflation are ensured through its consensus algorithm and community governance. Hard forks can only succeed if they have sufficient support from miners and nodes in the network.

Furthermore, while some may view hard forks as problematic, they also provide an opportunity for innovation and experimentation in cryptocurrency development. It allows developers to try out new features or address issues without compromising the integrity of the original blockchain.

In conclusion, while there may be concerns about hard forks affecting supply credibility in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, it ultimately depends on how they are handled by users within their respective communities.