If I used whirlpool in sparrow wallet to coinjoin three sets of 100,000 sats. They went through 4 mixes each.

Do I lose all privacy gained if I consolidate those three UTXOs in the same wallet?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No.

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=800x450&blurhash=i56aPA%7D%3FD%7D0%7E16Rj-3%24zkZR6RQS2XStQxasnRjNG5NS%7E%25OrX%23ijGN%23bvsiJ8NasmxZoMSgW%3Bo0sAtUM%7CM%5E%252oijFnfRjf.&x=0a30a905beeb810fbe15044f9e4390017ec3bb1f489ec8a4014b61e4c7ac5ee8

Do you mean consolidate in the same address? This links the UTXOs together by common ownership

#whirlpool #coinjoin #Samourai

I mean to use sparrow wallet to select those 3 UTXOs and send it to a new receive address in the same wallet. To make it a bigger UTXO

Checkout this article by @QnA

https://bitcoiner.guide/csimplications/

Little bit outdated now with the 'mix to' feature in Sparrow and Whirlpool CLI.

Maybe time for an update 🤓 🤠🤙

PRs are welcomed

there are trade offs and implications whenever you combine uxtos to a single address

there are also ways and tools to obfuscate and create plausible deniability

You only associate them.

So you don't know the original UTXOs, just that they are now all linked together?