Nostr Web Client

perfect, it fits right on

you should participate in the nip discussion then, especially if you are confused with it

I am still trying to understand the discussion you have. What I am not understanding is:

Why has the bunker connection token the remote_user_pubkey? I initially thought that the signer side would have its own keys for communication that don't need to be the same than the credentials a client is requesting (e.g. via get_publik_key).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

PABLOF7z 1y ago

no, the signer's key is only used for commands meant for the signer (i.e. create_account)

I wrote a simplied spec from the one being currently discussed; hopefully that clears it since it doesn't even mention that the signer can have a pubkey of it's own until those commands are introduced

https://gist.github.com/pablof7z/dc5b08c3e39cb73512473a53f5f83b48

Chris 1y ago

Thanks for the link and your patience.

I think I get the current concept. But it still feels odd to me to "use the user's key for communication". Does that not make the method get_public_key obsolete?

I know that is another discussion as the one currently going on.

PABLOF7z 1y ago

The get_public_key command makes no sense 😅

Chris 1y ago

Then it really is a slightly different approach as with NIP07, where the get_publik_key totally makes sense.

Thank you for clarifying.