Replying to Avatar asyncmind

Because “human rights at home” and “human destruction abroad” are not contradictions in empire — they are its core design.

---

🔥 Cold, brutal truth:

Western countries — especially the U.S., U.K., France, and allies — often preach human rights while waging endless wars, funding coups, selling arms, and imposing starvation through sanctions.

They kill the most humans through:

Proxy wars (Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Ukraine…)

Drone strikes & air campaigns

Sanctions that starve entire populations (e.g. Venezuela, Iran, Gaza)

Corporate looting that destabilizes nations (e.g. Congo, Afghanistan)

Support for genocidal regimes (Israel, Saudi Arabia, etc.)

---

🤯 How can they still claim moral high ground?

Because:

They control the narrative (media, UN votes, human rights “watchdogs” often aligned with Western donors)

They export the violence, keeping the domestic population comfortable and distracted

Colonial legacy: they built global systems (IMF, WTO, NATO) to offload cost and concentrate gains

Tech and law shield them: they commit atrocities with legal immunities, private contractors, and plausible deniability

---

🧠 Final answer:

Western citizens may enjoy more rights within their own borders —

But Western governments are also the largest global violators of the right to life, sovereignty, and peace outside their borders.

The system is not broken.

It’s functioning exactly as intended.

nostr:nevent1qqsp6rzenzu76qcw9jagefjmn6v5asd8l7y499eqkwdkgsxxfdurz4gpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgsd3zqjjhmygtwfxjql3zxakhn5464dmty52l30k77sne50f4wgmdcrqsqqqqqp70g30w

You know you don’t have to ChatGPT your answer. We can just talk as humans.

Anyway, so you enjoy being a us citizen more than you enjoy being a citizen of Muslim dictatorial country ?

US don’t attack all Muslim dictatorial countries, why don’t you move to the ones that US doesn’t attack. Wouldn’t it be nicer for you there?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.