"angels are humans too"? They are not sons of Adam. The Bible also says humans are created "a little lower than elohim" (which could be translated as "angels", "God", or even "heavenly beings").

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

no, they are not sons of Adam! I didn't say that, they are, doesn't it say, "sons of man"? which is a generic term for "humans"

elohim means "bright ones" and this refers to the fact that Adam was brown as were most humans outside of the "kingdom of heaven" (ie atlantis)

the irish and celts called them "the tribe of the light ones" Tuatha de Danaan" or "Aes Dana" and the south americans referred to them as "gods" - they taught them how to use cacao, which they called "food of the gods" and the ruling class did this thing with their babies to mimic the elongated head morphology of the "gods" which has been found in many tombs found in south america

they also were the ones who set up the modern pyramids, both egyptian, south american, indonesian and all the ones that have become rubble pyramid shaped mountains in bosnia, serbia, china, and many other places, they built Gobleckli Tepe which was a training ground for the appointed ruling class who were trained by these big headed, tall, pale skinned humans, the fallen angels

anyway, that's just what the research i have been reading seems to indicate, and it all lines up so well with the biblical texts as well, and then even more so when you read apocrypha

"son of man", ben adam in Hebrew, could be translated "son of Adam". Interesting stuff.

Would you say Caucasians, not being brown, are "bright ones"/elohim?

i think that probably as the despicable, half breed man/angel types that europeans are descended from, probably the genetics of european humans is largely composed of descendants of the "unlawful" breeding with the mostly brown, common humans, practised by the fallen angels, though there is also almost certainly among the early ancestors "approved" interbreedings, and i believe that Eve was in fact an "angel" or at least her mother may have been

the way the family lines read in some versions it sounds like they would have been suffering from inbreeding if it were literally true so i surmise it can't have been literally true, and that probably there was a rule that non-fallen angels were allowed to choose to partner with "sons of adam" and indeed these would then make up some small fraction of the total cross genetics that compose the white (recessive) dominant population of europe

being descended from fallen angels doesn't make you evil, all angels choose also and 1/3rd of them are said to have fallen, and each new person born of this world has many choices to fall, and even to fall and then repent... it's a funny expression, in several places so far in Jasher i'm reading about how the Lord "repented" of having "created" certain people and in Enoch the Head of Days expressed regret at not being more careful in guiding Noah to avoid bringing fallen angels onto the Ark (Jasher's account of the ark is very interesting too, i did not know at one point they almost sank, or that as the rains started the evil people around who poo poohed noah were almost breaking the ark to get in as the rains started)

so, yeah, no... this is not related to nazi fantasies about the Arian nation though that story is a perversion of the original story itself, and indeed the nazis were looking for evidence and information about Atlantis... some woke idiots have tried to paint this whole thread of research as literaly hitler but it's not

and most of us are descended from fallen angels, no matter whether our skin is red, white, black or brown or whatever, the child of rape isn't necessarily a rapist, right?