Can someone answer this realistic question❔️❓️❔️❓️❔️❓️:

❇️ "Could it be that Charlie Kirk’s influence became too great with the youth?" ❇️

(That He Was Eliminate for his influence on the youth...🤔😐🤔)

----------------------------------------------------

Try to understand "THE BIG PICTURE",

in history, this is often done when someone has "too much influence", it happens even faster when they are against the status quo 🤔

sooner or later the person gets eliminated.

😶Who wins, when the person is Eliminated ❕️❓️❓️❓️❓️

-------------

The most important aspect is, even if we disagree with someone:

⛔️ ➡️ "freedom of speech is now threatened, and politicians are going to abuse the situation, to deprive the individuals of their freedom" ⬅️ ⛔️ with

the excuse that they want to protect the individuals (MORE SURVEILLANCE TOOLS: ID, CAMERAS, TECHNOLOGY, RESTRICTING MOVEMENT WITH EXTRA RULES/LAWS, ... )"

All are hidden restrictions, and as end result you can't move like you want even when you are a good person and more important you

can't speak truth against evil wrong doing (against powerful evil groups or people)

Please learn from history, politicians and other powerful groups are not going to

miss this opportunity to strengthen their own position "at the expense of society/the majority"

The excuse will be as always fear based (something like: increasing protection or safety measures), also the centre of the excuse will be a bogeyman or terrorism.

Stay Attentive and Fight for The Freedom You Still Have 🔦, 😤

🩵Fight against evil deeds/rules/perception "with words"!🩵 I'm against physical fighting.

🫡: "THIS IS TO PREVENT, THAT THE INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS BEING BROKEN DOWN🔎👀❕️❗️❕️❗️❕️❗️❕️😑"

* STAY VIGILANT *

🔺️ 🔥 The Bitcoin Revolution 🔥😳❗️🔺️

🩵❤️‍🔥🩵

Ps: When you find freedom of speech is important. Can you repost this content, and spreading awareness before too many people are going to accept extra surveillance...?