Another useful idea is antimoderators. 1a committed individuals who go around deanointing moderators and removing people from the censorship filter. But this also potentially leads to further gamesmanship.

Email is the most filtered protocol *in the world* and yet has zero problems with politicization of abuse filters, because the primary independent filters are Bayesian. This offers both clarity and fairness — everyone knows what is banned and the censorship is applied equivalently to everyone.

The most dangerous part of censorship is the arbitrary and carious nature of it. On Twitter and Bluesky, the same statement will get one person banned and not another, because the former is an informant for the intelligence services.