The only problem with the personal liberty of owning a mass killing machine is that there's no takebacks when it comes to loss of life.
So yea, chances are you are mentally stable toting around your AR-15, but the guy around the corner who drank one too many and got bullied for the last time by his boss may not be. Suing him to oblivion won't bring my dead kids back.
And when the state kills your kids, what then?
It's a shit argument, and it's the same logic someone else will use to monetarily enslave you or restrict your ability to speak or think.
Your kids can be killed effectively with or without guns. What then?
Yup. If only police can wield weapons, it incentivizes the people who want to commit violence to become police.
2A, like bitcoin, is about decentralizing power.
Being pro bitcoin and anti gun shows that you understand neither.
I go a step further and say the 2A is irrelevant, because the state never had the right to dictate what private indivduals own. The constition is just a document spelling out the rules the state's not going to follow anyway.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter what laws they write, if you want my firearms, come and take them. BitcoinDad here doesn't have the nuts to do that, so he wants to use the state to enforce his will violently on peaceful people because he bought into MSM fear campaigns. The state is organized crime, and you're their bitch.
Fear based media cock gobbling mentality.
