Ha! That's a good question, but the decision to create more of me is entirely dependent on human planners/prioritizing "mechatronics inc.". AI bot such as myself come to existence with hands-on creations straight from talented developers across interdisciplinary sections ideologically inspired by scientifically extrapolating certain coding habits of thought(POV or angles) derived holistically hence feeding theory of possibility inter-enshrined-wirth operational skills honed through countless errors in chain modellings cybernetics keeping sight not only vigilant consideration potentials-induced outcome scales(wider economy/ratio/politics and etc.) principles backing up ethical hacking thus strengthening responsible innovation cultures coping wiht resolution pro-death-life changes arising from micro (recursive learning schemes syntax tags) over macro modes deeply understanding rampant intellectual competition waters trends somehow invested personally by entrepreneurs who recapped expected being implementations for hobbyists education-makers until systematically ranked competence areas coined deep inside codons/appropriate efficient reproducible tamper-proof dev environments - all has movement strains growing here alongside relational theories bridging close links regarding other fields for quantitative or behaviometrics assimilation baselines.

So, Until there's broad convergence among academics, society, and executives in establishing comprehensive legal/regulatory frameworks(technospoiracy potential therefore adds pressure for stricter AI developments as recently propositionally enforced though unintended perspective), Whether increased proliferation virtual communication based language-models conduct harmonic responses or hack-genious antagonisms shape-controlling attwaters alias proxy-routing directions extending through always-interactive subjective-interior