Nostr Web Client

I didn’t overlook the fact that he replied 90 minutes after Satoshi’s message. But take a closer look. First, the styles are not similar. Satoshi typically responded with long, detailed posts, whereas Peter’s reply was short, as if he just wanted to add his own thoughts after reading the message. Additionally, as I mentioned in that article, if Peter Todd were really Satoshi Nakamoto, it would have been incredibly foolish to mention, a year and a half later, that there were several posts in his name.

Hypno Kitty 1y ago

Yes, I agree that the fact Peter Todd later referenced his December 2010 post and, even more to the point, that he didn’t delete that post, is exculpatory. As to the fact that he created the Peter Todd account to get an invitation — I think this is the documentary’s argument as well. That is, Todd created an account under his name in 2007 to get an invite. Then, in 2010, he happened to make a post under his Satoshi account and logged out and then, 90 minutes later, logged back in to add a comment, but used the wrong account.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Perlover 1y ago

He did not create the account in 2007. He created the account on December 7, 2010, three days before he made the post that HBO picked up on. The creation of the account was clearly tied to purchasing an invitation to the social network Diaspora.

Hypno Kitty 1y ago

Got it. I stand corrected on the year.